For the Freelancer.com Community
Your rating is your income. Protect it before you deliver.
We scan, then we forget. You keep what you want.
On Freelancer.com one bad review can sink your next ten bids. The fastest way to lose a five-star streak is to deliver code that turns into a security problem after the client goes live. AllScanTool scans the code you hand over for SQL injection, XSS, hardcoded credentials, and insecure functions, right in your browser, before you mark the milestone complete. No logs. No storage. No retention. Your code stays private.
In a marketplace, your last delivery is your reputation
Clients rate the work after it ships, and a vulnerability found weeks later still comes back to your profile. These are the risks AllScanTool catches before you submit the milestone.
One bad review undoes ten good ones
A single security incident after delivery turns into a one-star rating that future clients see before they read anything else.
Fixed-price milestones, no time to spare
You bid low to win the project, so there is no budget for a separate security pass before you submit the work.
Code stitched together from many sources
To deliver fast you combine snippets from forums, AI, and old projects, with no single review of what you are actually shipping.
Disputes that hinge on code quality
When a client opens a dispute, claims about insecure or broken code are hard to defend without proof the work was checked.
Chargebacks and refunds after handoff
A vulnerability discovered post-delivery can mean a refund demand, lost earnings, and a damaged completion rate.
No team behind you — just your profile
As a marketplace freelancer there is no security reviewer, so the last line of defense before delivery is you alone.
Ask AST
Questions Freelancer.com sellers bring to the Delivery-Layer Engine before they hit submit.
QI am about to deliver a project milestone — how do I confirm the code has no SQL injection before the client reviews it?
Paste the files into the scanner. AST flags any query built from unsanitized input and points you to prepared statements, so the work is clean before you submit the milestone.
QA client says my last delivery had a security problem — how do I check the code so it does not happen on this one?
Run the project through AST and it surfaces XSS, hardcoded secrets, and insecure functions, so you fix issues before handoff instead of finding out in a review.
QI built this fast from snippets to hit the deadline — did I leave any API keys or passwords hardcoded in it?
Scan the codebase and AST detects hardcoded credentials and stray secrets, so nothing private ships to the client in the delivered files.
QA client opened a dispute over code quality — how can I show the work was checked for vulnerabilities?
Scan the delivered code and AST gives you a clear read of what is and is not flagged, so you can speak to the security of the work with confidence.